Just ran across this article on investing in renewable energy in the New York Times. The author Norm Alster thinks that the new Democratic Congress will be good for renewable energy (I agree.) For instance, I think there’s an excellent chance that the Dems will renew the Production Tax Credit before it expires at the end of 2007, and most renewable technologies, especially wind an geothermal will see big boosts when that happens.
He interviews several asset managers, and their picks are Sun Power in for solar, Zoltekfor carbon fiber used in wind turbines (no mention of the fact that Zoltek is currently embroiled in a nasty lawsuit with Structural Polymer Group over breach of contract), corn ethanol producers (too much overbuilding for my taste), Headwaters(more of a emissions reduction company), Herman Miller (I hadn’t realized they were big into recycled plastics) and Interface (one of my faves, but I wish it were cheaper) for the green building angle.
Just looking at the list of companies above, I can think fo good reasons to buy, as well as good reasons to sell every company mentioned (except Herman Miller & Headwaters, which I have not researched.) I won’t do anything just because I saw them mentioned in the NYT, but that doesn’t mean that it’s not interesting.
I like to look at other people’s ideas about how to invest in renewable energy, because it tells me what other people are thinking about. I look for ways to invest in renewable energy that not a lot of others are thinking about… that way, when they do start thinking about (and buying) the ones I have bought, the price rises. That’s the theory anyway.
Another way to use others’ research without getting caught in the stampede it to start watching the ones other people like, and wait for them to get bored. If a company does not produce any good news for several months, people who got in on a rush of excitement will get impatient and sell… that’s the time to get in… unless the company really is boring.
Nobody said investing was easy.